Criminalizing Criticism Of Israel

(PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS)   On October 16, 2004, President George W. Bush signed the Israel Lobby’s bill, the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act. This legislation requires the US Department of State to monitor anti-semitism world wide.
To monitor anti-semitism, it has to be defined. What is the definition? Basically, as defined by the Israel Lobby and Abe Foxman, it boils down to any criticism of Israel or Jews.
Rahm Israel Emanuel hasn’t been mopping floors at the White House.
As soon as he gets the Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 passed, it will become a crime for any American to tell the truth about Israel’s treatment of Palestinians and theft of their lands.
It will be a crime for Christians to acknowledge the New Testament’s account of Jews demanding the crucifixion of Jesus.
It will be a crime to report the extraordinary influence of the Israel Lobby on the White House and Congress, such as the AIPAC-written resolutions praising Israel for its war crimes against the Palestinians in Gaza that were endorsed by 100 per cent of the US Senate and 99 per cent of the House of Representatives, while the rest of the world condemned Israel for its barbarity.
It will be a crime to doubt the Holocaust.
It will become a crime to note the disproportionate representation of Jews in the media, finance, and foreign policy.
In other words, it means the end of free speech, free inquiry, and the First Amendment to the Constitution. Any facts or truths that cast aspersion upon Israel will simply be banned.
Given the hubris of the US government, which leads Washington to apply US law to every country and organization, what will happen to the International Red Cross, the United Nations Commission on Human Rights, and the various human rights organizations that have demanded investigations of Israel’s military assault on Gaza’s civilian population? Will they all be arrested for the hate crime of “excessive” criticism of Israel?
This is a serious question.
A recent UN report, which is yet to be released in its entirety, blames Israel for the deaths and injuries that occurred within the United Nations premises in Gaza. The Israeli government has responded by charging that the UN report is “tendentious, patently biased,” which puts the UN report into the State Department’s category of excessive criticism and strong anti-Israel sentiment.
Israel is getting away with its blatant use of the American government to silence its critics despite the fact that the Israeli press and Israeli soldiers have exposed the Israeli atrocities in Gaza and the premeditated murder of women and children urged upon the Israeli invaders by rabbis. These acts are clearly war crimes.
It was the Israeli press that published the pictures of the Israeli soldiers’ T-shirts that indicate that the willful murder of women and children is now the culture of the Israeli army. The T-shirts are horrific expressions of barbarity. For example, one shows a pregnant Palestinian woman with a crosshairs over her stomach and the slogan, “One shot, two kills.” These T-shirts are an indication that Israel’s policy toward the Palestinians is one of extermination.
It has been true for years that the most potent criticism of Israel’s mistreatment of the Palestinians comes from the Israeli press and Israeli peace groups. For example, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz and Jeff Halper of ICAHD have shown a moral conscience that apparently does not exist in the Western democracies where Israel’s crimes are covered up and even praised.
Will the American hate crime bill be applied to Haaretz and Jeff Halper? Will American commentators who say nothing themselves but simply report what Haaretz and Halper have said be arrested for “spreading hatred of Israel, an anti-semitic act”?
Many Americans have been brainwashed by the propaganda that Palestinians are terrorists who threaten innocent Israel. These Americans will see the censorship as merely part of the necessary war on terror. They will accept the demonization of fellow citizens who report unpalatable facts about Israel and agree that such people should be punished for aiding and abetting terrorists.
A massive push is underway to criminalize criticism of Israel. American university professors have fallen victim to the well organized attempt to eliminate all criticism of Israel. Norman Finkelstein was denied tenure at a Catholic university because of the power of the Israel Lobby. Now the Israel Lobby is after University of California (at Santa Barbara,) professor Wiliam Robinson. <>Robinson’s crime: his course on global affairs included some reading assignments critical of Israel’s invasion of Gaza.<>
The Israel Lobby apparently succeeded in convincing the Obama Justice (sic) Department that it is anti-semitic to accuse two Jewish AIPAC officials, Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman, of spying. The Israel Lobby succeeded in getting their trial delayed for four years, and now Attorney General Eric Holder has dropped charges. Yet, Larry Franklin, the DOD official accused of giving secret material to Rosen and Weissman, is serving 12 years and 7 months in prison.
The absurdity is extraordinary. The two Israeli agents are not guilty of receiving secrets, but the American official is guilty of giving secrets to them! If there is no spy in the story, how was Franklin convicted of giving secrets to a spy?
Criminalizing criticism of Israel destroys any hope of America having an independent foreign policy in the Middle East that serves American rather than Israeli interests. It eliminates any prospect of Americans escaping from their enculturation with Israeli propaganda.
To keep American minds captive, the Lobby is working to ban as anti-semitic any truth or disagreeable fact that pertains to Israel. It is permissible to criticize every other country in the world, but it is anti-semitic to criticize Israel, and anti-semitism will soon be a universal hate-crime in the Western world.
Most of Europe has already criminalized doubting the Holocaust. It is a crime even to confirm that it happened but to conclude that less than 6 million Jews were murdered.
Why is the Holocaust a subject that is off limits to examination? How could a case buttressed by hard facts possibly be endangered by kooks and anti-semitics? Surely the case doesn’t need to be protected by thought control.
Imprisoning people for doubts is the antithesis of modernity.
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He is coauthor of The Tyranny of Good Intentions
He can be reached at:

2 Responses to Criminalizing Criticism Of Israel

  • I hope Santa Barbara is the worst example of rabbinical Talmudist fascism and mind control. Hannah-Beth Jackson’s bill to criminalize support for the BDU movement, ADL-Google censorship approved by the school board in an least one county public high school, and, as of March 20, 2017, Jackson has introduced a bill to censor “fake news” in the county.
    I don’t think many Christians are aware that the 1909 Illuminati-authored, Rothschild-sponsored Scofield bible includes unsupported eretz-Israel text and footnotes, written by a person with no knowledge of ancient Hebrew or Aramaic or other qualifications – additions explicitly banned in the written Torah, with the penalty of the imposition of all curses mentioned in Torah for violation. I know that neither Jews nor Christians are aware that what’s referred to as Judaism today is rabbinical Talmudism based on the Babylonian Talmud, Kabbalah and Zohar that are the pagan beliefs that led to the exile of the Hebrews from Israel, and that reading the bible – Torah, the Penateuch, and the prophets (the OT) is proscribed by the pharisees who consider their teachings to be the authority, rather than the words of Yahweh in scripture. The genocide of the am- ha’aretz, the common people who didn’t recognize the false authority of the pharisees over scripture during the Holocaust, has been well-suppresses, in spite of statements by Talmudic rabbis in support of Hitler’s mass murder of these authentic Jews. There is no biblical Judaism today other than the tiny Karaite sect, also persecuted by Talmudic pharisees. Talmudism is satanism, self-worship and racial supremacy that contradicts the bible and is enforced through rabbinical fascism. The end-time deception that’s supported through the ignorance and brainwashing of evangelical Christians.

  • The Big Lies that have enabled the substitution of rabbinical teachings mentioned in my comment above are 1) that Torah includes a ban on its reading by anyone other than the pharisees, and that it can’t be interpreted by anyone other than these trained rabbis. The books of Moses (Torah) and the entire Hebrew bible, which includes the books of the prophets, Tanach, contain neither of these restrictions, but do include a ban o any additions of subtractions.
    The Babylonian Talmud was written beginning in the first and second centuries AD – after the pharisees crucified Jesus Christ, whose opposition to their false teachings is an important theme in the New Testament. The term Judaism has been hijacked and perverted firom the religion of the Jews that Christians read in the New Testament. When Jews today refer to Torah, they’re referring to anti-Torah pagan Babylonian Talmudism.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Show some support!

We are 100% Listener & User supported!! Every little bit helps us continue. Donations help fund the site and keep all the free information on it. Thanks in advance and KEEP UP THE FIGHT!!!

Visitor Map

Subscribe For New Posts & Updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to FederalJack and Popeyeradio and you will receive notifications of new posts by email.

News Categories
The Wigner Effect
Col. L Fletcher Prouty: Secret Team