Senator Lindsey Graham in open denial of scientific proof of 9/11 treason
(9/11 BLOGGER) Below is some of what a representative in Senator Graham’s DC office told me on October 1st in response to my further inquiry into the Senator’s acknowledgment and response to the information we gave him and he willingly accepted to take a look at. http://www.911blogger.com/node/20578
At first contact, his office refused to say he had looked at the information. Now they have admitted he has reviewed the information but is still sticking with the 9/11 Commission Report, scientific evidence to the contrary be damned and his oath not withstanding.
Now, Senator Graham is adding an amendment to the appropriations bill that reads in part: “None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available for the Department of Justice by this Act may be obligated or expended to commence or continue the prosecution in (a civilian) court of the United States of an individual suspected of planning, authorizing, organizing, committing or aiding the attacks on the United States and its citizens that occurred on September 11, 2001.”
He hopes to reinforce the Military Commissions Act that he helped craft in dealing with the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks and the Global War on Terror. A severe and telling irony in all this is that a core concern that Graham expresses is the protection of classified information. Meanwhile, I as an everyday American citizen have access to open scientific evidence that helps point in the proper direction to the true architects of the 9/11 black op murders, have given this to the Senator in the open on the record, and he persists in willful denial of the facts of the matter and what they mean.
Senator Graham should consider whether those that give “comfort” to the enemies of the United States of America and its Constitution, and the murderers of the people of this country and the world by denying overwhelming scientific evidence should also be tried in Military Commissions. I would opt for open criminal cases in federal court, where evidence can be known, analyzed and weighed not only by a jury and a judge but by all interested people in the world. Are you with or against the terrorists Senator Graham?
Senator Graham’s representative: “He believes what was written in the 9/11 Commission and nothing more.”
Jeremy Rothe-Kushel: “And so he thinks the science is wrong, the science that we handed to him? He’s had scientific advisors tell him that the science is wrong?”
SGR: I’m not saying the science is wrong. I’m just saying that he believes that the planes that flew into the World Trade Centers were the only things that brought them down.”
JRK: “And how does he think that this high-tech explosive made its way into the dust of the World Trade Center? Does he have an explanation for that?”
SGR: “No he does not.”
JRK: “So basically he’s operating in denial of science as it stands today, the leading edge of scientific proof about how our fellow citizens were killed on that day?”
SGR: “If you want to put it that way.”
JRK: “And did he look at the–because we also included a packet from the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, it was 850 of them now that point out the very obvious evidence that those buildings did not just collapse from the fires. Did he look at that too?”
JRK: “And so he thinks all those 800 architects and engineers are wrong?”
SGR: “Uh, he doesn’t think they’re wrong, he just thinks–I mean he’s not going to change his opinion. His opinion thus far is agreeing with the 9/11 Commission. Until something else comes out that changes that, that’s what he believes.”