New revelations in ‘torture’ case

New revelations in ‘torture’ case

Binyam Mohamed

Mr Mohamed returned to the UK after allegations were dropped

An MI5 officer visited Morocco three times at the same time a UK resident says he was being tortured there as a terrorist suspect, it has emerged.

Former Guantanamo Bay detainee Binyam Mohamed is bringing test case claims against UK authorities which, he says, were complicit in his alleged torture.

The government says it did not know he was held in Morocco and Afghanistan before being taken to the US camp.

MI5 says its official did not know Mr Mohamed was in Morocco at the time.

The details emerged in a High Court judgement on Friday, which was an update on a ruling on the secret evidence in Mr Mohamed’s case, originally made last year.

Covert location

Lord Justice Thomas and Mr Justice Lloyd Jones took the unusual step of reissuing the judgement to include new material about the security services dealings with the case.

It emerged that “Witness B” – an MI5 official who had questioned Mr Mohamed previously when he was arrested in Pakistan in 2002 – had made three visits to Morocco, during the period Mr Mohamed said he was being held and tortured there.

How high up in the British government did this sordid truth travel?
Clive Stafford Smith
Reprieve

The judgement says it was clear to the security service that by September 2002 he was being held in a covert location and they continued to supply information and questions.

But the judges said they were “unable to determine the significance (if any) of the visits of the MI5 official, known only as “Witness B”.

BBC home affairs correspondent Andy Tighe said MI5 maintained its official did not know Mr Mohamed was in Morocco at the time and the two men did not meet.

But legal charity Reprieve described it as a “strange coincidence”.

Terrorism allegations

Reprieve director Clive Stafford Smith said it was clear senior UK intelligence personnel had known about Mr Mohamed’s treatment, adding: “One question that must be asked is how high up in the British government did this sordid truth travel?”

Mr Mohamed had been accused of attending terrorist training camps and being involved a plot to set off a radiological device but the US authorities eventually dropped the allegations and released him from Guantanamo Bay.

The government unreservedly condemns the use of torture as a matter of fundamental principle
Home Office

The Ethiopian national, who moved to the UK when he was 15, returned in February and is among several former detainees taking legal action against the British authorities.

He says he was tortured after being arrested in Pakistan in 2002 and being moved to Morocco and Afghanistan, before arriving in Guantanamo Bay in 2004.

He accuses the UK authorities of being “complicit” in it and British intelligence of supplying some questions.

But the government has said it did not know his whereabouts between his arrest in Pakistan and his arrival in Guantanamo Bay.

Confidentiality

In a statement, the Home Office said it would not comment on individual cases but “security service officers act within the law”.

“The government unreservedly condemns the use of torture as a matter of fundamental principle and works hard with its international partners to eradicate this abhorrent practice worldwide,” it said.

“The security and intelligence agencies do not participate in, solicit, encourage or condone the use of torture or inhumane or degrading treatment.

“For reasons both ethical and legal, their policy is not to carry out any action which they know would result in torture or inhuman or degrading treatment.”

The High Court is also considering whether a summary of US reports on Mr Mohamed’s detention should be published.

He believes it will prove the UK knew he was being tortured in Morocco before being flown to the US detention camp.

But Foreign Secretary David Miliband argues confidentiality is key to intelligence sharing and as it was US information, it was for them to decide when to publish it.

The US denies that evidence used against Mr Mohamed was obtained by torture while the UK government says it has never “condoned the use of torture”.

In March, Attorney General Baroness Scotland confirmed the police would investigate whether an MI5 officer had been complicit in the alleged torture of Mr Mohamed.

Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/8177941.stm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Show some support!

We are 100% Listener & User supported!! Every little bit helps us continue. Donations help fund the site and keep all the free information on it. Thanks in advance and KEEP UP THE FIGHT!!!

Visitor Map

Subscribe For New Posts & Updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to FederalJack and Popeyeradio and you will receive notifications of new posts by email.

News Categories
The Wigner Effect
Col. L Fletcher Prouty: Secret Team