Myth Of Dark Matter Continues To Unravel

(TOM WILSON)   Astronomers and astrophysicists are so keen to identify cold dark matter that almost any argument is accepted in the physics journals and the popular science media without apparent critical reasoning.

A recently published paper in the Journal of Physics A by Adler (2008) calculates the maximum amount of cold dark matter that must be present in the space between the Laser Geodynamics Satellites (LAGEOS) and the Moon’s orbit. Adler asserts that there is at most the equivalent to 4 x 10^-9 of Earth’s mass of dark matter in that volume (2.4 x 10^16 kilograms).

This scientific journal article was reported on the Scientific American and the American Scientistwebsites, among others. Unfortunately, the writers and editors seem not to have read the original paper and were more concerned with sensational headlines about dark matter than responsible science reporting. Still worse, the editor of the Journal of Physics A didn’t seem to pay much attention to the paper.

What Adler does is deceptively straightforward. He uses published measurements for the gravitational parameter (GM in units of kg^3/s^2, the product of the gravitational constant G and the object’s mass) for the Earth alone, the Moon alone, and the Earth and Moon combined. After subtracting the values for the Earth alone and the Moon alone from the value of the two combined, what is left must be dark matter.

Adler’s value for the combined GM parameter is 403503.2357 ± 0.0014. His value for the Earth alone is 398600.4356 ± 0.0008, and his value for the Moon alone is 4902.8000 ± 0.0003. Each of these gravitational parameters is derived using a different method with different sets of assumptions, and are then “tweaked” in different ways (with implicit assumptions) before the final calculations. In the end, Adler finds the GM for dark matter to be 0.0001±0.0016. By dividing this value by the GM for the Earth, the result is a ratio of (0.3 ± 4) x 10^-9. Based on that result, he asserts that there must be a mass of dark matter less than 4 x 10^-9 times that of the Earth in that volume of space (G assumed to be a constant).

There is a deep flaw in the proposal that the difference in these values is statistically significant. What has been found is that the GM value selected for the Earth-Moon combination versus the separate GM values for the Earth and Moon alone agree well within their stated tolerances.

Alternatively, the value for the combined Earth-Moon GM is 403503.2357 ± 0.0014. If for comparison the separate Earth and Moon values are added using standard interval calculations to get the new error, the value is 403503.2356 ± 0.0011. Looking at these two values with error bars on a chart, the second summed value fits perfectly within the 95% confidence error bars of the original combined value. There is no significant difference between the two values.

This error in reasoning is immediately followed by another statistical sleight of hand. Adler computes the dark matter-to-Earth GM ratio of (0.3 ± 4) x 10^-9. From this he uses only the positive side of the 95% confidence interval to assert there is at most 4 x 10^-9 the fraction of Earth’s mass in dark matter between Earth and the Moon. This is really misleading. The positive side of a confidence interval has no more statistical significance than the negative side. It is 0.3 plus or minus 4, not just plus. That means -3.7 is as statistically valid as +4.3. The best that he can propose (if we can ignore the error in assigning a statistically insignificant difference to dark matter at all) is that there is a 95% likelihood of there being or not being any dark matter in that volume of space. That is not really so enlightening.

However, the fundamental errors he makes in interpreting these calculations does not stop the flights of fancy in the Scientific American article one bit:

“Based on current data, Adler estimates in the October 17 Journal of Physics A that at most some 24 trillion metric tons of dark matter lies between Earth and the moon. Such a dark matter halo might explain the anomalies seen in the orbits of the Pioneer, Galileo, Cassini, Rosetta and NEAR mission spacecraft. Adler also speculates that dark matter could exert dramatic effects on the four gas giants in our solar system—Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. If these massive worlds have gravitationally captured dark matter, then dark matter particles could smash into them—rare events but enough to heat up the gas giants and account for why the insides of these planets (and even Earth) seem hotter than known mechanisms can explain. It might also account for why Uranus seems anomalously cold—the planet is bizarrely tilted, perhaps because of a colossal impact, and Adler surmises that this collision might have knocked away most of the dark matter cloud that might typically have heated Uranus.”

It’s difficult to know where to start with a critique of the Scientific American article. First, the writer obviously did not read the paper, or if he did, he has no grasp of confidence intervals. Second, the amount of mass under consideration is comparatively tiny.

Twenty-four trillion metric tons is not even a very big asteroid. It’s not even in the top 10 of asteroid masses. So how this is meant to explain spacecraft orbital anomalies is not clear. Allowing for similar dark matter “halos” around the other planets, it will not exert any significant gravitational force on the Pioneer spacecraft.

Third, there’s the speculation about Uranus. By definition, dark matter does not interact with “regular” matter. So how a collision with Uranus would have “knocked away” dark matter is difficult to understand.

Adler correctly states that there are anomalous temperature phenomena associated with Venus, Saturn and other planets. The Electric Universe model uses observational data of electrical currents in space to propose hypotheses about these temperature anomalies. Wal Thornhill used the Electric Universe model to correctly predict that Saturn would have hot North and South Poles (even though the North Pole was in total darkness for over 15 years). Comparing this to Adler’s ideas, how would dark matter collisions preferentially heat the North and South poles?

The Electric Universe model also predicts the spacecraft orbital anomalies. Space probes develop a negative charge as they move through space. As Wal Thornhill discussed in “A Mystery Solved,” in the weak but steady electric field of the Sun negatively charged spacecraft will experience a small “anomalous” acceleration toward the Sun.

Those employed by our scientific establishment, as well as scientific reporters, should be held to a high standard of critical thinking. In addition, the readership must not take any assertions from the scientific community at face value. A scientific theory is best assessed by its ability to provide testable predictions of the Universe around us. By adopting an attitude that asserts a theory is no longer open to being falsified, we have moved from science to faith. The Electric Universe movement encompasses a wide range of testable models and propositions to explain the world around us. It is also about empowering an educated public to demand better science from our scientists.

Contributed by Tom Wilson

http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2009/arch09/090216margins.htm

3 Responses to Myth Of Dark Matter Continues To Unravel

  • Obviously, we know much more than scientists. Because you know, years of education on their part, is much less than us.

    I’m sorry, but assuming that dark matter can’t exist just because its “Impossible” (more like improbable, mind you) to exist, is idiotic.

  • is “The light bends the gravity”.
    The second theory is “The matter produces the gravity field, and the energy of emission produces the separation field”.

    —————————————————————————

    Let’s change the Einstein field equation a bit.

    Einstein original Rab – 1/2 * Rgab = 8paiG/c^4 * Tab

    Modified version Rab – 1/2 * Rgab = 8paiG/c^4 * (Tmab + i*Teab)

    Here: Tmab is the stress tensor by matter
    Teab is the energy tensor by emission energy

    Then this should be the Modified Einstein Field Equation (MEFE).

    It is said by all the people that the gravity has the same intensity regardless of the direction of measurement and that it is isotropic. But I think that the gravity will work not only three dimensionally but also two or one dimensionally. In the two or one dimensional gravity, the gravity will be concentrated in one plane or line and will have a stronger effect than three dimensional gravity has. Then the separation forces are necessary in order to smash the gravity into two or one dimension.
    Then the imaginary factor is necessary.

    According to the Einstein Theory;
    Matter warps the continuum according to the amount (or mass) which exists in any locality. Then all motion along world lines in the vicinity must follow the warp.If world lines must follow warps in space, beams of light passing near the mass should be deflected with a certain angle.
    But here for me, the light can’t be deflected one-sidedly. It should also affect back the gravity field. Beams of light will loosen the gravity field to the orthogonal direction slightly. And huge amount of beams of light or emissions will shove away the gravity field in a thin-depth disk.

    There are three phases of the relation of gravitation and separation.

    elliptical galaxy e.g. NGC4881 “Three Dimension” -> ordinary Newton’s equation
    GM(smaller than r)m/r^2 = mv^2/r
    gravitationally unstable

    barred spiral galaxy e.g.NGC1300 “One Dimension” -> new New1ton’s equation
    G”M(smaller than r)m = mv^2/r

    spiral galaxy e.g. NGC4414 “Two Dimension” -> new New2ton’s equation
    G’M(smaller than r)m/r = mv^2/r
    gravitationally stable

    There are also phase-shifts among those three phases.

    —————————————————————————

    The Law of Universal Gravitation and Separation

    It is the universal force which unifies gravity and separator into one. No one ever knows about the separator force. So now, I give a definition of the law of universal separation at first.

    Fs = – Sp Ea Eb / r^2 F ; the separation force
    Ea ; Energy which belongs to the point a
    Eb ; Energy which belongs to the point b
    r ; the distance between a and b
    Sp ; the separation constant
    This force will not be detected on the Earth. It can be negligible even in the solar system. But it will work in the galactic scale.
    Next step is to unify Gravitation and Separation into one law.

    Fg = G Ma Mb / r^2 —————–Then,
    Fg+s = G Ma Mb / r^2 – Sp Ea Eb / r^2

    And assume that Sp = G / c^4, because E = mc^2.

    Fg+s = G Ma Mb / r^2 – (G / c^4) Ea Eb / r^2

    One step forward by using the complex number formula.

    F = G ( Ma + i Ea / c^2 ) ( Mb + i Eb / c^2 ) / r^2
    F = G Ma Mb / r^ – (G / c^4) Ea Eb / r^2 + i ( G Ea Mb / ( r^2 c^2 ) + G Ma Eb / ( r^2 c^2 ))
    The real part is Re( F ) = Fg+s, but I don’t know how to deal with the imaginary part ; Im( F ) = G Ea Mb / ( r^2 c^2 ) + G Ma Eb / ( r^2 c^2 ).

    So an existing substance is to be described as S = M + i E / c^2 .
    In a certain independent area, if M + E / c^2 = constant ( in other words when M decreases by ΔM, E will increases by ΔE = ΔM c^2 ), then abs( S ) = will be minimum when M = E / c^2, because abs( S ) = root( M^2 + E^2 / c^4 ).

    “Energy” is the emission of light. In the beginning there was only the light with the energy ( = Eo ). At present equilibrium, the total matter in the space is (1/2)Eo/c^2 and the total energy has decreased to (1/2)Eo.

    http://www.geocities.jp/imyfujita/galaxy/galaxy01.html

    Iori Fujita

  • The issue of Dark Matter is a NON-ISSUE for any one who has studied physics and the empirical sciences of the 19th century and early 20th. Tesla, Dayton Miller, Whittington, Kelvin and others had empirical evidence of the existence of aether. In comes the fraud and plagiarist Einstein and out goes all the empirical research on aether. Einstein was an unrepentant plagiarist and he was called out NUMEROUS times by his superiors.

    I also take issue with lori fujita’s interpretation that the emission of light IS energy.

    Energy comes in different forms and that is not something that is taught. What is taught is a notion of a single phenomena called energy instead of a number of phenomena which are in the subset of things constituting energy.

    Read Tesla and Dayton Miller’s work regarding pure longitudinal waveforms with velocities faster than the speed of light (aether).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Show some support!

We are 100% Listener & User supported!! Every little bit helps us continue. Donations help fund the site and keep all the free information on it. Thanks in advance and KEEP UP THE FIGHT!!!

Visitor Map

Subscribe For New Posts & Updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to FederalJack and Popeyeradio and you will receive notifications of new posts by email.

News Categories
The Wigner Effect
Col. L Fletcher Prouty: Secret Team