Drug Policy vs. Homicide Rates

(Jacob Sullum)   According to a new report from the U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime, Honduras and El Salvador have the highest homicide rates in the world, at 82.1 and 66, respectively, per 100,000 people. Despite the surge in violence that has accompanied Mexican President Felipe Calderon’s anti-drug crackdown, which has killed more than 40,000 people since 2006, Mexico’s homicide rate—18.1 per 100,000—makes it seem placid by comparison, although it is more than three times the U.S. rate (5 per 100,000), which in turn is high compared to those of other liberal democracies. The violence in Central America also is largely driven by the war on drugs:

U.S. officials say crackdowns on drug cartels in Mexico and Colombia have pushed gang activity to Central America, which has long been a lucrative corridor for trafficking.

Caribbean countries, most notably Jamaica, have also been affected by drug-related violence, the report said.

Mexico has seen a 65 percent increase in killings since President Felipe Calderon launched his offensive against drug cartels in late 2006, the report found.

Here are the 10 countries with the highest homicide rates:

  1. Honduras: 82.1
  2. El Salvador: 66
  3. Cote D’Ivoire: 56.9
  4. Jamaica: 52.1
  5. Belize: 41.7
  6. Guatemala: 41.4
  7. U.S. Virgin Islands: 39.2
  8. Saint Kitts and Nevis: 38.2
  9. Uganda: 36.3
  10. Trinidad and Tobago: 35.2

The Netherlands ranks near the bottom, with a homicide rate of 1.7 per 100,000 people, about one-third the U.S. rate. Remember when Bill Clinton’s drug czar, Barry McCaffrey, claimed lax Dutch drug policies helped explain why “the murder rate in Holland is double that in the United States”?

http://reason.com/people/jacob-sullum/all

4 Responses to Drug Policy vs. Homicide Rates

  • If foreign drug producers and domestic distributors are to be put out of business, domestic law enforcement must be concentrated on RETAIL SALES. Present legislation backing the “war on drugs” criminalizes mere possession. Worse, it purports to reverse the onus of proof in drug-possession trials. That reversal is incompatible with the rule of law and is therefore unconstitutional in ALL jurisdictions. More: http://is.gd/noreverse .

  • The drug laws and the consequent economic predation is and always has been the problem. Addiction is a poverty consequence; budget cuts a slow mass kill program of voiceless and defenseless started by illegally elected corporate republicans and republicrats. So get rid of civil forfeiture below $1,000,000 (economic stimulus), legalize cannabis, and get rid of drug testing; replace it with employee assistance program hyped at the beginning of subversive drug war. Have 5 year track record of solid outcomes with harm reduction programs in Seattle and vancouver BC. Canadian supreme court just legalized safe needle drug injection sites across canada; see what free higher education can do for a country. This move allows addicts to come up for air and receive help so they maybe can quit someday when they are able. CENTRAL LIE OF DRUG WAR; ADDICT MADE A CHOICE TO USE; SO CAN MAKE A CHOICE TO QUIT; WRONG, WRONG, WRONG NAZIS.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Show some support!

We are 100% Listener & User supported!! Every little bit helps us continue. Donations help fund the site and keep all the free information on it. Thanks in advance and KEEP UP THE FIGHT!!!

Visitor Map

Subscribe For New Posts & Updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to FederalJack and Popeyeradio and you will receive notifications of new posts by email.

News Categories
The Wigner Effect
Col. L Fletcher Prouty: Secret Team