Dozen states will decide presidential winner

(GINA SMITH)   Want to know who will win the presidential race in November? Forget South Carolina. (The candidates will.) Instead, focus on North Carolina and a dozen other states.

  • How the states are expected to vote in the November presidential race, the number of electoral votes at stake and the average of the latest polls in the closest races:

    President Obama

    Obama-solid states (142 electoral votes) — California (55), Delaware (3), District of Columbia (3), Hawaii (4), Illinois (20), Maryland (10), Massachusetts (11), New York (29), Rhode Island (4), Vermont (3)

    Obama-likely states (42 electoral votes) — Connecticut (7), Maine (4), New Jersey (14), New Mexico (5), Washington (12)

    Leaning Obama (37 electoral votes)

    Minnesota (10) — Obama leading by 11.6 percentage points

    Oregon (7) — Obama leading by 8.6 percentage points

    Pennsylvania (20) — Obama by 7.8 percentage points

    Obama total — 221 electoral votes

    Mitt Romney

    Romney-solid states (85 electoral votes) — Alabama (9), Alaska (3), Arkansas (6), Idaho (4), Kansas (6), Kentucky (8), Louisiana (8), Mississippi (6), Nebraska (5), Oklahoma (7), South Carolina (9), Utah (6), West Virginia (5), Wyoming (3)

    Likely Romney states (55 electoral votes) — North Dakota (3), South Dakota (3), Tennessee (11), Texas (38)

    Leaning Romney (36 electoral votes)

    Arizona (11) — Romney leading by 6.8 percentage points

    Georgia (16) — Romney by 10 percentage points

    Indiana (11) — Romney by 9 percentage points

    Montana (3) — Romney by 8.25 percentage points

    Romney total — 176 electoral votes

    Toss-up states (136 electoral votes)

    Colorado (9) — Obama leading by 3 percentage points

    Florida (29) — Obama leading by 0.8 percentage points

    Iowa (6) — Obama by 2.5 percent age points

    Michigan (16) — Obama by 1.8 percentage points

    Missouri (10) — Romney by 3 percentage points

    Nevada (6) — Obama by 5.3 percentage points

    New Hampshire (4) — Obama by 5.7 percentage points

    North Carolina (15) — Romney by 1.2 percentage points

    Ohio (18) — Obama by 2.6 percentage points

    Virginia (13) — Obama by 3 percentage points

    Wisconsin (10) — Obama by 4.4 percentage points

    If the leader today in each swing state won, what would be the result?President Obama would be re-elected in an electoral landslide.

    SOURCES: Real Clear Politics and The State newspaper

    South Carolina: The next swing state?

    As South Carolina’s Hispanic population grows and an increasing number of African-Americans register to vote, S.C. Democratic Party chairman Dick Harpootlian predicts the Palmetto State, too, could be a swing state in coming presidential cycles.

    The state’s population increased by 15 percent from 2000 to 2010, according to U.S. Census data, much of the increase in the state’s minority population.

    In April, GOP strategist Karl Rove raised some eyebrows when he said South Carolina already was a swing state, an assessment he later backed away from.

    “It is shifting demographically to more of a swing state,” Harpootlian said. “If (presidential Democratic campaigns) wanted to apply the resources, it could happen.”

    Republicans shake their heads in a mixture of incredulity and mirth at such statements. “Dick Harpootlian believes in the tooth fairy, too,” said Chad Connelly, chairman of the S.C. Republican Party. “Obama has been so bad. He’s been such a divider. Principles matter to people of all color.”

    — Gina Smith

     

As it has done in every presidential cycle since 1980, conservative South Carolina’s nine electoral voters will be won by the Republican nominee — in this case, Mitt Romney — leaving little reason for national Democrats or Republicans to pay attention to the Palmetto State.

South Carolina’s two political parties aren’t even focusing on the Palmetto State. Instead, both have turned their attention to neighboring North Carolina, one of about a dozen toss-up states considered winnable by either candidate.

The candidate — Democratic incumbent Barack Obama or Romney — who wins the most electoral votes in those states will win in November.

Consider recent history.

In 2000 and 2004, George W. Bush did well in the swing states and won the presidency. In 2008, President Obama grew the list of swing states to about a dozen, claiming surprise wins in North Carolina, Indiana and Virginia.

This year will be more of the same. The key will be whether voters in those key states are still in the 2008 mood for change that ushered Obama to victory or whether they are in the 2010 Tea Party mood of limited government and less taxation.

Both candidates will face challenges as they fight to clinch the 270 electoral votes needed to win.

Obama is unlikely to galvanize as many voters as he did four years ago, when he was the first African-American candidate on a major party’s ticket. And the struggling economy remains an albatross around his neck.

But conservatives are not enthusiastic about Romney either who has struggled with a flip-flopper image and questions about his time at the helm of private equity firm, Bain Capital.

Battleground North Carolina

Both the S.C. Democratic and Republican parties are sending S.C. volunteers to North Carolina in hopes of swaying the result there.

In some ways, the state is similar to right-leaning South Carolina. For example, it too has an anti-union sentiment and its voters, like those in South Carolina in 2006, overwhelmingly approved a constitutional ban on gay marriage this year.

Also, in 2010, N.C. Republicans took control of the state’s Legislature — a first in more than 100 years. Both houses of South Carolina’s Legislature have been GOP-controlled for a dozen years.

But the Tar Heel state is growing in a way that helps Democrats. Its urban centers are outpacing its rural areas in population growth, which allowed Obama to squeak out a North Carolina win in 2008.

As North Carolina continues to become less white and more urban, Democrats hope to win again in November, going so far as choosing Charlotte for their national convention in September in an attempt to woo Tar Heels.

S.C. Democrats, many of whom went to North Carolina in 2008 to help Obama, are helping out again.

S.C. Democratic Party chairman Dick Harpootlian said the party, in partnership with Obama for America, has been sending volunteers to North Carolina for the past three months to knock on voters’ doors.

“Do you want to wake up on Nov. 7 to four years of President Mitt Romney? Four years of the 1 percent driving the rest of us into financial ruin?” reads an email blasted out last week from Harpootlian to S.C. Democrats. “Just one day of volunteering between now and election day in North Carolina by phone or in person can make the difference.”

S.C. Republicans too are organizing to send volunteers to North Carolina, Ohio and other toss-up states, said Chad Connelly, chairman of the S.C. Republican Party, with plans to kick the effort into full swing in August.

“North Carolina is going to swing back” Republican, Connelly predicted. “People, particularly young people, were duped by Obama into believing he represented something different. Instead, he’s a left-leaning socialist, and we all know it now.”

An average of recent North Carolina polls by the website Real Clear Politics puts the two candidates in a neck-and-neck race with Romney up by 1.3 percentage points.

Shifting populations, shifting politics

Besides North Carolina, the battleground states this year are Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, Ohio, Virginia and Wisconsin.

Some battleground states, including Virginia, are seeing their longtime politics changes as their populations change.

High growth in northern Virginia, including the diverse suburbs of Washington, has turned Virginia, once solidly Republican, into a swing state. Obama won the state in 2008 — the first Democrat to do so since Lyndon Johnson in 1964.

And he could win the state — heavily dependent on federal jobs — again in November. Obama leads Romney by 3 percentage points in an average of six Virginia polls, compiled by Real Clear Politics.

Labor unions

Labor unions could shape the campaign in several key swing states, including Ohio with its high percentage of unionized workers in the steel and auto industries.

Ohio is a must-win for Romney. Over the last half-century, no Republican has won the White House without winning Ohio.

President Obama won the state by 5 percentage points in 2008. However, Ohio’s state politics have shifted in the GOP’s favor since then. In 2010, Republicans successfully won the governor’s office, took back the state House of Representatives and replaced five Democrats in the U.S. House.

But a fight over labor unions threatens Republicans newfound Ohio power.

In 2011, the Legislature, backed by the state’s Republican governor, attempted to reduce unions’ bargaining rights. However, voters overwhelmingly rejected the idea in a referendum. Gov. John Kasich’s approval rating remains well below 50 percent, making him as less-than-ideal friend to the Romney camp.

Taking on unions also will be part of the discussion in another battleground state, Wisconsin. There, Republican Gov. Scott Walker survived a recall vote last month, with some help from S.C. Gov. Nikki Haley, after he took on his state’s unions.

It’s likely to be a similar fight in Michigan, where voters have, for the past five presidential cycles, picked the Democratic nominee, in part, because of GOP hostility toward labor unions.

Michigan suffers from one of the nation’s highest unemployment rates, which could give Romney, a Michigan native whose father was a popular governor there, a much-needed boost.

But President Obama will continue to counter that joblessness would be worse in Michigan, Wisconsin and Ohio if the federal government had not bailed out General Motors and Chrysler, a bailout he will note — again, and again, and again — that Romney opposed.

Swing states Obama may lose

Several once solidly Republican states turned their back on their GOP roots in 2008, casting their electoral votes for Obama instead, seemingly becoming swing states. But as the economy continues to struggle, Obama has lost his luster in some of the states.

Indiana voters, for example, narrowly chose Obama in 2008. It was the first time in 40 years that a Democratic presidential candidate had taken the state. But media reports suggest that Hoosiers’ 2008 pride in Obama, from the neighboring state of Illinois, has all but vanished as Indiana’s economy has continued to struggle.

It is a similar scene in Nevada, where foreclosure and unemployment rates remain high. Add to that a large Mormon population and Romney has a good shot at winning the state. Meanwhile, the Obama camp hopes that Nevada’s large Hispanic population will benefit the incumbent.

And in Iowa, where Obama ignited young and middle-aged voters in 2008, media reports say supporters have not been impressed with his first term. He may struggle to rev up the state’s large number of independent voters, who are moderate, as well as its evangelical Christians, who disagree with his backing of gay marriage. Polling shows Obama and Romney in a dead heat in the state, which launched Obama’s 2008 campaign after he beat Hillary Clinton in its caucuses.

Other ballot items

The presidential race in the battleground states also could be affected by ballot referendums that motivate large numbers of voters — Democrats or Republicans, or both — to show up at the polls.

Hot-button ballot measures have been employed as a successful strategy since 2004, when they were credited with upping the conservative turnout in swing states. In 2006, for example, many believe an Ohio ballot measure — defining marriage as being between a man and a woman — helped President George W. Bush narrowly win re-election.

Ohio has no similarly divisive measure on the ballot this time around.

But some other states do.

In the kingmaker state of Florida, which boasts the nation’s third-largest number of electoral votes, voters will decide whether public money should be barred from going to health insurance policies that include abortion coverage.

And, in Colorado, a proposal to legalize marijuana for recreational use could turn out liberal voters.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Show some support!

We are 100% Listener & User supported!! Every little bit helps us continue. Donations help fund the site and keep all the free information on it. Thanks in advance and KEEP UP THE FIGHT!!!

Visitor Map

Subscribe For New Posts & Updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to FederalJack and Popeyeradio and you will receive notifications of new posts by email.

News Categories
The Wigner Effect
Col. L Fletcher Prouty: Secret Team