Death by Flu Shot. 7 Year-Old Receives Flu Vaccine; Dies 4 Days Later

February 5, 2013 by  
Filed under Featured Stories, Health

(VAX TRUTH)   When a normal, healthy, vibrant seven year-old child dies suddenly we want to know why.  Things like that just don’t happen – at least they didn’t used to happen at the rate they appear to be happening lately.

This report from an Independent News Source in Vermont  relates the story of what happened after Kaylynne Matten was taken by her parents for her annual physical on December 2, 2011.  During the physical Kaylynne was given a flu vaccine.  Four days later she was dead.  She wasn’t even sick when she went to the doctor!

The state health commissioner, Dr. Harry Chen, “is not convinced” the girl’s death was from the flu vaccine, citing the “very rare” incidence of serious reactions to the flu shot and the huge numbers of people who receive them each year. Dr. Chen declares that serious reactions to flu vaccines are so “rare” that death by flu shot has never been reported in Vermont.

BINGO! There’s the problem. Every time a healthy child dies or is seriously injured by a vaccine, those who are responsible for determining the cause of death immediately rule out vaccines because they are “so safe” and serious reactions are “so rare” – No. They’re not. They’re just not reported because of people like Dr. Chen, whose job is dependent on the sale of vaccines. That’s what he does. He ensures that all of the people in his state are fully vaccinated. Without vaccines, Dr. Chen would be unemployed; at the very least he’d be looking for another job. But then, without vaccines there would be a LOT of doctors looking for jobs, so there’s a good chance Dr. Chen would be collecting unemployment benefits.
Dr. Chen is worried that people will over-react to this girl’s death. He cautions about “alarmist” reactions to the death of Kaylynne Matten.  Excuse me?  We are not supposed to be ALARMED?  Clearly, Dr. Chen has become complacent when it comes to young children dropping dead for “no apparent reason.”  Dr. Chen is worried that if people become “alarmed” their concerns may lead them to avoid getting a flu shot. If they start looking into the dangers of flu shots, it’s a very slippery slope.  You know how it goes.  Flu shot research is like “the gateway drug” that causes us (parents who are easily influenced) to become fanatics.  We research the flu vaccine and the true dangers of the flu and before you know it we start to realize we’ve been lied to.  From there it’s all downhill for Dr. Chen and his cronies.  As we become “hooked” on research we learn more and more about vaccines and the more we learn the more we realize that vaccines are dangerous and the risks of infectious diseases are small in comparison.

As the article states, Vermont already has one of the most dismal (hear the sarcasm, please) vaccination rates in the nation. If even more people start researching and learning about the children and adults throughout the U.S. and the world who have died or been seriously harmed by vaccines, that dismal number might just fall even farther. Heavens! That would be a real tragedy – for Dr. Chen.

The fox is guarding the henhouse. How in the world can this vaccine-related death even be questioned? It’s like saying “John Smith walked across the 495 beltway and was hit by a semi. Mr. Smith survived the accident and was taken to the hospital where he lapsed into a coma and died 4 days later. Mrs. Smith believes it was the semi that killed her husband. The hospital administrator (who happens to be married to the driver of the semi) is not so sure. Autopsy results are pending…” GIVE ME A FREAKIN’ BREAK!

According to the CDC there are between 3,000 and 49,000 deaths each year in the U.S. due to the flu (influenza). That sure sounds like a lot of people dying from the flu. Before we become “alarmed” by these “huge” numbers, lets see what they mean in terms of the percentage of U.S. citizens.  The U.S. Census Data indicates that the population of the U.S. is somewhere around 300,000,000 people:  304,059,700 as of the latest data.  That means in a “good” year (fewer deaths from flu) the percentage of U.S. citizens who die from the flu is 0.0000986%.  Whoa….. that’s a lot of zeros.  In translation, this equates to 9.8 (less than ten) people for every 1 Million citizens in the U.S.  Of course, in a very BAD year the numbers are higher.  Taking the worst-case scenario (49,000 deaths), the yearly death toll would be 0.0016115% of the U.S. population. This number equates to 1.6 (less than two) deaths per 1,000 people. That’s a little bit scarier.  However, we have to consider how many of those deaths occur in 7 year-old children.

Just what is the real risk of death from flu for a seven year old?  How do we find out?  If we just read the article, we are told “The majority of those severe illnesses and [3,000 to 49,000] deaths occur among infants, young children, pregnant women, seniors and people with chronic medical conditions.”  I don’t know about you but when I read this I tend to think this means infants, young children and pregnant women are those who are MOST at risk. It might just be me, but when something falls at the top of the list when someone is talking about relative risk, I associate that with meaning they are the ones we need to be most concerned about. Actually, the opposite is true in this case.

The CDC has this to say about the demographics of annual deaths from the seasonal flu:

Among persons aged <19 years, an estimated annual average of 97 (range: 41 in 1981–82 to 234 in 1977–78) influenza-associated deaths with underlying pneumonia and influenza causes occurred . The average annual rate of influenza-associated deaths for this age group was 0.1 deaths per 100,000 persons (range: 0.1–0.3). Among adults aged 19–64 years, an estimated annual average of 666 (range: 173 in 1981–82 to 1,459 in 2004–05) influenza-associated deaths with underlying pneumonia and influenza causes occurred. The average annual rate of influenza-associated deaths for this age group was 0.4 deaths per 100,000 persons (range: 0.1–0.8). Among adults aged ≥65 years, an estimated annual average of 5,546 (range: 673 in 1978–79 to 13,245 in 2003–04) influenza-associated deaths with underlying pneumonia and influenza causes occurred. The average annual rate of influenza-associated deaths for this age group was 17.0 deaths per 100,000 (range: 2.4–36.7). Deaths among persons aged ≥65 years accounted for 87.9% of the overall estimated average annual influenza-associated deaths with underlying pneumonia and influenza causes.

So…. how do we figure out the risk for a seven year-old? One way would be to divide 97  by 19, which would give us the average number of deaths per year of age. We can estimate this as FIVE, since 97 is very close to 100 and 19 is very close to 20.  According to this calculation, there are approximately FIVE seven year-olds in the U.S. who die from the flu each year. Clearly the risk of death from the flu was astronomically small for 7 year-old Kaylynne.

Dr. Chen can talk all he wants about the risks of flu. His fear mongering won’t save his job. People are too smart to fall for the trickery anymore. Parents in the United States and around the world are tired of being lied to. We are tired of doing as we are told and watching our children die as a result.

Dr Chen:  I suggest you update your resume. I think you’re going to need it.

Flu Vaccine Deaths:  Just How Rare Are They?  Learn How to Find Out for Yourself.

 

Kaylynne Matten:  Cause of Death “Undetermined.” Parents Believe Flu Vaccine Killed Their 7 Year-Old Daughter.

 

To learn more about vaccine ingredients and their effect on health, click here.

http://vaxtruth.org/2012/01/death-by-flu-shot-7-year-old-receives-flu-vaccine-dies-4-days-later/

Comments

12 Responses to “Death by Flu Shot. 7 Year-Old Receives Flu Vaccine; Dies 4 Days Later”
  1. kell russell says:

    Thank you once again for this artical. You guys are doing a great job, keep it up.

  2. nunyabwax says:

    Flu shots should be completely banned. If it saves one life, it will be worthwhile. What’s good enough for "assault rifles", is good enough for flu vaccines.

  3. FreeRussian says:

    I am just curious how many kids need to die before their stupid parents wake up out of coma?

  4. Whizerd67 says:

    Ok Dr. Chen… let’s go with your lie, and say it wasn’t the vaccine.
    Must have been old age, or ‘natural causes’…right?

    You pathetic piece of …. well, I’d say shit..but that would give it credit…and you deserve none.

    Apologies to anyone mentally affected by the curse word. I’m just an angry parent..that’s all.

    ~Blessed Be to all~

  5. toboldlygo says:

    print his address ill do the rest
    NO BULLSHIT

  6. RobYork says:

    Bertrand Russell.
    From his book “The Impact of Science on Society” 1953 Page 50.

    “Diet, INJECTIONS, and injunctions (Laws) will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be, will become psychologically impossible.”

    And also:
    “Perhaps by means of INJECTIONS and drugs and chemicals the population could be induced to bear whatever its scientific masters may decide to be for its good.”

  7. C. Gonzo says:

    Someone wanted his address – here ya go.

    Department of Health- Commissioner Dr. Harry Chen
    http://www.healthvermont.gov | John J. Zampieri State Office Building, 108 Cherry Street, Burlington, VT 05401 | 1-800-464-4343

  8. Kathleen Murphy says:

    Strange how people try to refer to vaccines as "safe" when the law specifically refers to them as "unavoidable unsafe" -in comment k of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensation Act of 1986.

    And on 22 Feb 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (8-2) to interpret the NCVI Act of 1986 as meaning that vaccine makers have immunity from ALL liability, no matter what. (Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC No. 09-152)

    So, the burning question for all those who insist that vaccines are safe, is why does the law refer to them as "unavoidably unsafe"?

  9. POPEYE says:

    Well said. You just derailed their whole argument.

  10. C says:

    yeah ban all vaccines & start pandemics…flu shots are needed you dummies!

  11. John says:

    Hey ‘C’ you are the dummy for believing corrupt government lies that flu vaccines prevent pandemics.
    The latest ‘Swine flu’ was released by CDC agents to test response of the public to mass vaccinations.
    vaccines are grossly unsafe for many reasons; ingredients containing mercury and formaldehyde cause severe brain injury and other suds effects including death. Western countries with large vaccination rates are suffering from pandemics such as autism because of vaccines. I for one prefer my child to be a little bit ill for a few days than suffer from autism for the rest of their life.

  12. louise r says:

    I am a nurse and wouldnt take the flu vac

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!