War on Family

Bohemian Grove Protest 2018 Sacred Owls 10 Year Anniversary Tour

Sacred Owls BEWARE! TAKE CARE! SACRED OWLS 2018 U.S. TOUR TO BOHEMIAN GROVE’S CREMATION OF CARE PROTEST

This is it. The big one. The thing we have been fighting for almost 10 years now. So technically it is also the 10 YEARS OF THROWING IT THE FUCK DOWN TOUR, as well. We are facing our arch nemesis, The Bohemian Grove (Yes, that is the owl we put a buster on). We are teaming up with DarkDox, Coffins Collective, & Resist the Grove, Bohemian Grove Action and Resistance to bring you a 19 day, 12 state, U.S. Tour…

TO THE GATES OF THE BOHEMIAN GROVE TO PROTEST THEIR MENS ONLY (UNLESS YOU ARE A BOY) PEDO DEATH CULT CREMATION OF CARE OPENING CEREMONY TO THEIR SICK 2 WEEK ENCAMPMENT!

Starring: Henry Kissinger. Alan Greenspan, George W. Bush, his dad Magog, and all the other ghouls that make up the 1%!

GOVERNMENT SPONSORED TERRORISM RED VINYL PREORDER


We are excited to announce that we are pressing GOVERNMENT SPONSORED TERRORISM on RED VINYL for the first time! We have 9 days left to fill our preorder goal and need your help! This limited edition, hand numbered pressing is being funded by all of you! We just need to sell 100 pre-orders to get this thing into production! In addition, Diggers Factory will distribute copies to over 200 record stores WORLDWIDE which will really help get the word out there that we don’t want these scumbags running our world, and we plan on taking it back!

If the campaign runs out and we don’t hit our numbers, you will get a full refund. If we are close, we will just buy out the last few to make this happen. We need your support! If this goes well, we plan on putting Tales of Terror and all future releases on vinyl as well! Click here to pre-order now!

It Is Not Transphobic To Be Against The Sexualization Of Children

(Sacred Owls) This topic has been a real emotional struggle for us this past year. It is emotional because we feel so deeply when it comes to our goals of working towards total unity between all people. A goal that humanity has struggled with since the beginning. We want real unity. This means that all men, women, or other humans are treated with the same level of respect in every direction AS LONG AS they are not harming anyone. Harm, by our definition (and I would hope, any other decent, and moral persons definition) is when physical and sometimes severe emotional damage is inflicted on someone without their consent. Consent can only be granted by adults, never children. That is why children under 18 are required to have the consent of a parent or legal guardian before they can see a PG-13 or rated R movie. That legal consent is even still restricted, as an adult guardian cannot purchase alcohol, tobacco products, or pornography for children, with good reason.

The reason these things are off the table is because children are not ready for those things physically, or mentally. They are still developing as an organism. There is a biological reason most kids say “YUCK!” when they see people kissing. It is because they have not gone through puberty and their bodies and minds are not there yet. They cannot reproduce. They are not ready for sex. Therefore, should have no real understanding about what is “sexy”, therefore, should not be attempting to be sexy. Watch the video below and notice at the end where the young child lifts his short red skirt at the end of his “vogueing” followed by applause from everyone there. This type of dress is not appropriate for a little girl or a little boy as it is low cut and short on the bottom. Pairing that with sexually suggestive dancing that has been normalized through the corrupt music industry, run by pedophiles is nothing short of creep bait.

Also, do they expect me to believe that his little sister came up with the name LACTACTIA?! The name literally translates to lactation. Milk coming out of a breast through the nipple. Sure, nothing to see here. That is not by accident and the parents are strategically saying that his kid sister picked the name thinking they could fool the average viewer that it is some nonsense name that does not mean anything. There are actually people who fetishize breast feeding. Is that really an appropriate name for a scantily clothed, cross dressing child?! If you think so, you are sick or brainwashed into accepting this deviant behavior.

The sad thing is, I honestly believe this young boy has NO IDEA what he is getting himself into. He just likes the art and attitude of the fashion industry and wants to express himself. What he does not realize is that the fashion world is a sick, predatory, depraved, and dangerous world full of pedophiles, drug addicts, and violent people. Even adults over the age of 18 get destroyed going through this meat grinder of an industry.

Several months ago we posted our opinion on this subject on Facebook and boy did that stir up a shit storm. To be clear, Sacred Owls is 100% fully supportive of any and all Lesbian, Gay, Bi, Transgender, Queer, or other alternative lifestyle choices EXCEPT PEDOPHILIA. Why? Consent. Why is rape a crime? Consent. If two consenting adults want to role play with a rape fantasy, although we find that behavior to be destructive personally, we support your right to do it in the privacy of your home because there is no crime, so long as it is between consenting adults. You need both. To be an adult, and for those adults to consent. Why is a mugging or any other type of assault and/or battery a crime? Consent. If you are part of a fight club and agree, as an adult, that you want to fight and accept the risk of injury or death, this is your right, as an adult. A child legally cannot consent to these things. It is possible to be supportive and accepting of LGBTQ people and be against the sexualization, recruiting, grooming, & indoctrination of children. Sacred Owls fights for equality and justice for those who harm no one regardless of sex, gender, or other. We hunt pedophiles who have co-opted the LGBTQ movement in order to have the P added to the end of LGBTQ. P cannot be added because CHILDREN CANNOT CONSENT, THUS MAKING PEDOPHILIA A CRIME.

Some people argue that the age on consent is lower than 18 in some states, and in other countries it is WAY lower. This is true, some states in the United States are 16 and 17 as shown in the map below.

(thesurvivoralliance.com) Map Key: 16 – Blue, 17 – Dark Green, 18 – Light Green

However, there are groups lobbying to LOWER the age to as low as 10 or simply abolish the legal age of consent to sex all together, making prosecution of sexual assault of a minor even more difficult than it already is. Currently, it is not as easy as you think to bring a case involving sexual abuse of a child to trial, let alone get a conviction without DNA evidence or a witness other than the victims sworn testimony. We are currently working a case locally where an Evangelical Christian youth pastor sexually molested a young girl from the ages of 14-16 before she was brave enough to tell his wife which was met with them lawyering up and denying it all together. We are going to release a documentary in the next year about this case once the investigation has been concluded.

Most decent people call us crazy when we tell them the country and really the world is run by a small group of pedophiles. There are occult reasons why they are involved in humanitarian efforts in where they house youths. Why does the Vatican run Boys Town, Nebraska, which has been notorious for sex trafficking of children? We know why. They are sick. They do it for power. They believe in dark arts. They believe you can absorb youth and life force by sexually violating children, using their blood in rituals. These are things so dark and disturbing that most decent people would rather call us crazy than believe that people would do such things when even Netflix has Occult Crime TV series about how often these things happen. The Franklin Cover Up has the most disturbing stories of occult, sexual, ritual abuse of children done by rich and powerful people all the way up to the white house, the Bohemian Grove, and other occult places where wealthy businessmen and politicians gather to do sick things. Some do it for the power, some do it because they are depraved, some do it to blackmail others. Once you have photos or video of an up and coming politician doing things of this nature, they are in your pocket for life. This is a tool used by secret societies like Skull and Bones, The Bohemian Grove, and others.

The FBI released a document of common symbols used by pedophiles. These symbols have been linked to Ping Pong and Besta Pizza as they used them in their logos and artwork. This is what became #pizzagate. Snopes calls Pizzagate “False” yet, there is SO MUCH EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT AN INVESTIGATION.

So what does this all have to do with trans-children and their relationship with drag queens, and the sexual counter culture? A lot.

Sexual education lobbyists are fighting to force younger and younger children to take courses about sexual preference, identity, anal sex, and other mature topics. When I say force I mean it. Some of these programs are not allowing parents to opt out! All of a sudden there are children far below the age of puberty, let alone the age of sexual consent, dressing in provocative drag. Again, I want to be clear, if a little girl was dressed in this way we would feel the same about it, so it has nothing to do with it being transgender or transsexual. It has to do with the sexualization of children. When we spoke against these practices, and taking children to burlesque shows and drag events, it was met with such hostility from certain people in the Orlando area. They said by saying that putting red lipstick, bold, colorful make up, and evening gowns, high heels, and other suggestive clothing items the WE are sexualizing them, which is ridiculous. You can say that something is inappropriate without thinking something is sexy. I feel like I shouldn’t even need to say that.

Some clothing, makeup, and accessories are sexually suggestive according to scientists, psychologists, and most of mainstream society. Again, it has NOTHING TO WITH IDENTIY OR PREFERENCE. Some dances and body language is sexually suggestive and is inappropriate for children. In todays age, everyone is so worried about not being labeled as homophobic or transphobic that they don’t take a hard stance against things that are clearly corrupt and have a larger agenda, so they show their bellies and get on their back in order to show support, regardless of the long term consequences. I have a 7 year old son that is such a wonderful, smart and amazing boy that is open minded, loving, and accepting of everyone. We have a lot of gay, queer, and trans friends that are around us all the time at shows, events we host at our house, or just hanging out. We love and accept them because they are good people, that is why they are in our life. If my son told me one day that he identified as a girl, I would tell him that if that is actually true, I will be supportive. There would be a long conversation about what that actually means, what that lifestyle is like, and why it is not a light hearted decision. If he wanted to wear a dress to school, I would be fine with it! I also respect parents that aren’t that open minded and radical or alternative. I would NOT let him wear a low cut top or short skirt like the 7 year old in the video above. Why? Because that is crossing the line into sexually suggestive clothing that psychologically calls for that sort of attention from creeps. Furthermore, young children have not gone through puberty and do not even understand what sex is, so any behavior or desire to look sexy is learned. I have NOTHING AGAINST drag queens, Ru Paul, or anything like that as long as they are not attempting to recruit, or groom children for pedophile sex. If ANYONE comes close to such a thing, they will be on our radar and we will work with law enforcement to make sure you lose your freedom. The sad thing is there are even people in law enforcement, politics, and religion who join those organizations as agents of NAMBLA (North American Man Boy Love Association) or other groups to make sure these criminals get away with it, which makes our fight that much harder.

We need your support in this fight.

I would like to end this piece by thanking from the bottom of my heart, all of the true friends who have stuck up for us, defended us, called out those who have made the baseless accusations of transphobia or homophobia pinned against us. We love you and we need more of you in this fight. There is a really great podcast that our friends at PFT Media & Get Rad Records put out that discusses these issues, what we went though, and what their views are in Episode #19 of Tidbits titled Trans AMerica that you can download and/or hear here.

 

 

Update: Video of Quentin Tarantino saying he thinks raping 13 year old girls is OK if they are “in to it” has been removed!

{Sacred Owls} The below video has been removed due to “copyright” reasons conveniently today after the Huffington Post, FederalJack.com, and SacredOwls.com published articles including it.

https://youtu.be/5B-UNVFTeuk

Here is a screen shot of this article earlier today.

And now…

This is clearly part of a cover up. Below is the original article.

I don’t know how This video fell between the seats. I have never seen it before today. As I listened to this Howard Stern interview with Quentin Tarantino where he is an APOLOGIST of Roman Polanski’s RAPE of a 13 YEAR OLD GIRL, I could feel the blood boil just under the skin of my face.

I felt like I didn’t need to ever say this… A 13 YEAR OLD CANNOT CONSENT TO ANYTHING without a parent or legal guardian’s consent. Even then, a parent cannot consent, legally, to just anything PRIOR to the act. SEX WITH A 40 YEAR OLD WHILE DRINKING ALCOHOL, AND CONSUMING ILLEGAL, SCHEDULE A, NARCOTICS UNDER AGE (BEING PROVIDED BY SAID RAPIST, ROMAN POLANSKI) IS RAPE AND IS ILLEGAL.

Let that sink in… Read what was just written above once more.

Quentin said it was not rape because she was “in to it”. Robin and Howard were appalled and agreed that it is rape, credit where due.

HOLLYWOOD, CA - MAY 04: Quentin Tarantino attends the ceremony honoring Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russell with a Star on The Hollywood Walk of Fame held on May 4, 2017 in Hollywood, California. (Photo by Michael Tran/FilmMagic)

You need to be 18 or older to consent to sex, legally, in practically every US state. It is one thing for a 16 & a 17-year-old to hook up. There is some grey area legally there if both parents are somewhat aware and don’t see harm in the two dating. But a 40-something-year-old “man” (more like predatory human piece of shit) GIVING DRUGS AND ALCOHOL TO A 13 YEAR OLD GIRL to COERCE FALSE (AND ILLEGITIMATE CONSENT)… That is something else all together.

Fucking shame on you Quentin Tarantino, I hoped you would never make my shit list. Don’t let me catch you engaging in pedophilia. Including when you think they are “in to it”. I know what your colleagues are into. We have the videos. We have the photos. We have the tapes.

You’d better hang up that chick habit, hang it up “daddy-o”, or we will cut you up in two. – Chick Habit (off the Death Proof soundtrack)

Quentin Tarantino Defends this Pedophilic Rape of a Minor in the US saying “she was down with it” and it was “Only Statutory Rape”

{Sacred Owls} Today, The day after the video of the Howard Stern interview with Quentin Tarantino was pulled from YouTube all of a sudden due to a copyright claim from Sirius XM I found myself searching the web to try to get the full video. I could only find clips… but they were shocking. At the bottom of this article I will include all the sources we compiled to produce this shocking 5 minute report. Producer Roman Polanski was in his 40’s back in 1977, where he was known to party in California with celebrities. This particular story is about when he had a love affair with a then 13 year old Samantha Jane Gailey. The full transcript of the testimony can be downloaded (PDF) here.

More resources

Related Article

Roman Polanski’s Pediphillic Rape and Drugging of 13 Year Old Samantha Jane Gailey at Jack Nicholson’s House in 1977

Medical marijuana mom faces another custody battle for supporting pot

(MOTOR CITY MUCKRAKER)   Steve and Maria Green watched in terror last year when Child Protective Services removed  8-month-old Baby Bree from their Lansing home.

Today, as Baby Bree turns 1, Maria Green is now fighting for the right to see her 7-year-old son.

The reason: They use state-approved medical marijuana.

Maria Green’s ex-husband is trying to deny Maria parental rights to her 7-year-son by saying that she and her husband are “ringleaders of a small separatist group within the Michigan Medical Marijuana Community” because they are involved in a pot advocacy group, The Human Solution, which does not promote anything illegal.

READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE

TV Star Jon Cryer Must Pay Child Support for Son in His Custody

(Robert Franklin, Esq.)   Two and a Half Men star Jon Cryer must pay child support for his son of whom he has custody. Here’s the opinion of the California appellate court.

Yes, it’s true.  Jon Cryer has almost sole custody of his son with Sarah Trigger Cryer.  She has 4% of the parenting time; he has the other 96%.  So you’d think she’d be paying child support to him, but no.  It’s the other way around.  He’s paying her because a Los Angeles trial court ordered him to and the appellate court upheld the order.

As you read the appellate opinion, continually ask yourself that tried and true question “what would happen if the sexes were reversed?”

Jon and Sarah were married in 2000.  Both were actors at the time.  They had a son, but divorced in 2004 with Sarah getting primary custody and Jon paying child support.  By 2009, Sarah’s life had gone from bad to worse.  Apparently she hasn’t had an acting job since 2005.  Indeed, if she’s had any job at all, it’s not reflected in the evidence before the court.  For that matter, she seems entirely disinclined to look for work, for reasons which will become obvious.

Both Jon and Sarah remarried, but it took only a few years for Sarah’s second marriage to hit the skids.  She had a son by that marriage too and maintained custody of both boys.

Soon though, Jon filed for a modification of custody saying that Sarah was an unfit parent who left the children unsupervised.  His request was denied, but the court admonished Sarah for negligent parenting.  In 2009, her child by her second husband was injured while under her care and both children were taken from her and given to their dads.

So Jon did the obvious thing; he asked the court to reduce his child support from $10,000 a month to nothing.  After all, he was the custodial parent and custodial parents don’t pay child support, they receive it, right?  Well, as the court admitted, that’s usually the case, but not here.  Here, Jon must continue paying Sarah $8,000 a month even though she only sees the child 4% of the time.

Why?  Because she’s a deadbeat, that’s why.  I’m really not making this up.  Sarah answered Jon’s request for a reduction of child support by saying it’s her only income, which apparently it is.  That’s because she hasn’t had a job of any kind since 2005.  Into the bargain, she’s not looking for one.  In her last filing, she listed her monthly income (outside of child support) as zero and her monthly expenses as over $13,000.

So, according to both the trial and the appellate courts, because Sarah is too much of a deadbeat to even attempt to support herself, Jon must continue to support her with the child providing the weakest of pretexts for doing so.

How many times have fathers been told that they should stop griping about the countless injustices of the child support system because it’s all for the child?  Yes it’s unfair they’re told, but just put a sock in it and pay; it’s for the child, don’t you see.

Well, this case gives the lie to that and doesn’t beat around the bush about it.  No one believes that it takes $8,000 a month ($96,000 a year) to support a child 4% of the time.  The money has nothing to do with child support; it has everything to do with deadbeat Mom support.  In this case, the bottom line is, well, the bottom line, and it is this – Jon earns a lot of money, Sarah earns none; therefore Jon pays Sarah even though he’s the custodial parent.  Simple.

Now no opinion in a custody case would be complete without genuflections to the best interests of the child, and this is no exception.  Sarah told the court that, if Jon didn’t pay her ”child support,” she’d lose the house she lives in and that he helped her buy when they got divorced.  Assuming that to be the case, that would mean that she’d have to live somewhere else.

According to both courts, that would be too traumatic for their son.  Keep in mind that 4% of a month is a little over a day.  So according to the court, asking the child to spend a day and a night with his mother in an apartment somewhere in Los Angeles would be so emotionally damaging to him that it warrants imposing child support on a custodial parent.

Of course it would be nothing of the sort.  Millions of children in this country live their whole lives in worse conditions and muddle through perfectly well.

Into the bargain, cutting Sarah off Daddy welfare might actually encourage her to better herself.  The judges didn’t manage to notice what everyone over the age of about 12 would – that the reason Sarah has no income and is making no effort to work and earn is that she’s living off of Jon.  Take his income away from her and maybe she’d start lifting a finger.  Hey, anything’s possible.

But the courts weren’t finished.  Perhaps sensing the radical injustice of what they were doing, both tried another tack.  Because Sarah’s children were taken from her by the Department of Children and Family Services due to her neglect, there was a dependency proceeding in juvenile court at the same time the child support issue was being litigated.

No one knew what the outcome of the dependency proceeding might have been; they only knew that Jon had custody and Sarah didn’t.  That could have changed at any time.  The juvenile court could have done anything from returning full custody to Sarah to terminating her parental rights altogether.

So according to the courts, nothing could be done about Jon’s child support obligation because, well, the juvenile court might alter the custody arrangement at any time.  Let me remind you; I’m not making this up.

We all know that, if the juvenile court had altered the custody situation significantly, either Jon or Sarah could have gone to court and requested a modification of child support based on changed circumstances.  And guess what.  The courts know that too; they even said as much.  But according to them, because circumstances might change in the future, their hands are tied; Jon has to keep paying to support his ex-wife because, well something might happen.

It’s hard to get more blatant than this.  It’s Mommy support thinly disguised as child support.  The child will never see one-tenth of this money.  In fact, she’s using it to pay her lawyers in the dependency case.

And again, imagine if the sexes were reversed.  Imagine a father saying “Judge, it’s true I can earn a living but haven’t lifted a finger to do so for six years, and it’s true I lost custody because I’m dangerous to the children in my care, but my ex-wife needs to pay me a large sum of money every month for a child I rarely see and we need to pretend it’s child support.”

Would the judge laugh him out of court or toss him in jail?  I can’t decide.

SOURCE

25 Signs American Women Are Being Destroyed By The Sexual Revolution And Our Promiscuous Culture

(THE AMERICAN DREAM)   Has the sexual revolution been good for American women?  Not at all.  In fact, when you look at the facts it becomes clear that the sexual revolution has been an absolute disaster for American women.  In the United States today, men have been trained to primarily view women as sex objects, and our culture has become exceedingly promiscuous.  As a result, the United States leads the world in teen pregnancy, there are 19 million new STD infections every single year, more than half of all children born to women under the age of 30 are being born out of wedlock and we are witnessing the systematic breakdown of the family unit in America.  And yet anyone that tries to teach our young women that they should dress modestly and keep themselves pure for marriage is severely criticized.  Well, if all Americans actually did keep themselves pure until marriage, we wouldn’t have nearly the problems with STDs, teen pregnancy and abortion that we do today.  The consequences of teaching our young women that they should be “free” to run around and sleep with a whole bunch of different men have been dramatic.  The following are 25 signs that American women are being destroyed by the sexual revolution and our promiscuous culture…

READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE

SEE ALSO: Down The Rabbit Hole w/ Popeye (01-23-2013) the Truth About The Womens Rights Movement, Women In Combat & The Destruction of The Family

Down The Rabbit Hole w/ Popeye (01-23-2013) the Truth About The Womens Rights Movement, Women In Combat & The Destruction of The Family

(FEDERALJACK)   On this edition of DTRH Popeye starts off by breaking down the recent decision by the Pentagon to allow women in frontline combat positions. Although to many the idea sounds like more opportunities for a woman’s career in the military the reality of the situation is drastically different. Popeye also exposes the myth that the women’s rights movement was about equal rights for women. You will hear from Aaron Russo, before his death of cancer, speak about information that was given to him by Nick Rockefeller as to the true purpose behind the Rockefeller family funding the women’s rights movement, and it certainly wasn’t so women could be free.

Play


YOU CAN ALSO LISTEN ON YOUTUBE

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Fed-Jack/136519313092470?fref=ts

Twitter: https://twitter.com/FederalJack & https://twitter.com/DTRH_Popeye

Popeye’s Archive Page: http://www.federaljack.com/?page_id=98027

Listen Live Page: http://www.federaljack.com/?page_id=11598

Dance studio offers kiddie pole dancing classes

(FOXNEWS)   A Canadian dance studio is offering pole dancing classes for children as young as 5 years old, CTV News reports.

Twisted Grip Dance & Fitness, in Duncan, British Columbia, has in its lineup a pole dancing class it calls “Little Spinners,” geared toward boys and girls of all ages, owner Kristy Craig tells CTV.

Craig said she introduced the class because existing clients wanted it, and so far three girls and one boy have registered for classes, which start on Sept. 22. Her youngest student is 5 years old, the oldest is about 12 years old.

Craig says there’s nothing sexual about the class, but the front page of the studio’s website shows sexy, sparkly high-heeled shoes for sale for performers, MyFoxDFW.com reports.

The children’s pole dancing class will reportedly offer moves similar to those used in the adult classes.

“It’s pure fitness and strength and fun,” Craig told the CBC. “I mean kids love climbing trees. They will climb anything.”

But not everyone thinks pole dancing is just a pint-sized playdate.

Child psychologist Dr. Derek Swain tells CTV News he doesn’t see a problem with pole dancing purely as a physical activity, but warns it could cause bullying and even increase the likelihood of girls becoming strippers when they’re older because of its ties with the sex industry.

“Sometimes these kinds of activities are more of an interest to the parent than they are to the kids,” he said.

 

Click for more from MyFoxDFW.com

Click for the full story from CTVNews.com

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/09/09/dance-studio-offers-kiddie-pole-dancing-classes/?test=latestnews#ixzz262BdkhBQ

Show some support!

We are 100% Listener & User supported!! Every little bit helps us continue. Donations help fund the site and keep all the free information on it. Thanks in advance and KEEP UP THE FIGHT!!!

Visitor Map

News Categories
The Wigner Effect
Col. L Fletcher Prouty: Secret Team