Bombshell: The Real Reason Barack Obama And Michele Lost Their Law License

June 24, 2012 by  
Filed under Featured Stories, Obamanation

(David Herold)   I am reposting for those who have missed it.

FORMER LAWYERS?

I knew they had both lost their law license, but I didn’t know why until I read this.

This is 100% legit. I check it out at www.iardc.org/ Stands for Illinois Attorney Registration And Disciplinary Committee. It’s the official arm of lawyer discipline in Illinois ; and they are very strict. (Talk about irony.) Even I, at the advanced age of almost 65, maintain (at the cost of approximately $600/year) my law license that I worked so hard and long to earn.

Big surprise.

Former Constitutional Law Lecturer and U.S. President Makes Up Constitutional Quotes During State Of The Union (SOTU) Address.

Consider this:

1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered his license back in 2008 in order to escape charges he lied on his bar application. A “Voluntary Surrender” is not something where you decide “Gee, a license is not really something I need anymore, is it?” and forget to renew your license. No, a “Voluntary Surrender” is something you do when you’ve been accused of something, and you ‘voluntarily surrender” your license five seconds before the state suspends you.

2 Michelle Obama “voluntarily surrendered” her law license in 1993. after a Federal Judge gave her the choice between surrendering her license or standing trial for Insurance fraud!

3. Facts.Source: jdlong.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/pres-barack-obama-editor-of-the-Harvard-law-review-has-no-law-license/

4. A senior lecturer is one thing, a fully ranked law professor is another. Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law Professor at the University of Chicago .

5. The University of Chicago released a statement in March 2008 saying Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) “served as a professor” in the law school-but that is a title Obama, who taught courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008.

6. “He did not hold the title of Professor of Law,” said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago School of Law.

Source: blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/03/sweet_obama_did_hold_the_title.html ;

7. The former Constitutional Senior Lecturer (Obama) cited the U.S. Constitution the other night during his State of the Union Address. Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of Independence … not the Constitution.

8. The B-Cast posted the video: www.breitbart.tv/did-obama-confuse-the-constitution-with-the-declaration-of-independence/

9. Free Republic : In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said: “We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal.

10. Um, wrong citing, wrong founding document there Champ, I mean Mr. President. By the way, the promises are not a notion, our founders named them unalienable rights. The document is our Declaration of Independence and it reads:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

11. And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court moments later in the same speech?

When you are a phony it’s hard to keep facts straight. Keep this moving — educate others

http://beforeitsnews.com/story/2288/275/Bombshell:_The_Real_Reason_Barack_Obama_And_Michele_Lost_Their_Law_License..html

Comments

25 Responses to “Bombshell: The Real Reason Barack Obama And Michele Lost Their Law License”
  1. Larry B says:

    Disturbing and in need of corroboration.
    Not sure I want to trust someone who thinks a right can be "unalienable" rather than "inalienable".
    The devil is ALWAYS in the details.

  2. MichaelfromOhio says:

    I’m surprised that Romney or none of the other Republicans have brought this up.

  3. carlton says:

    Actually, Larry B, the two terms are interchangeable, and ‘unalienable’ is the more frequently used of the two.

    Perhaps you should purchase a dictionary.

  4. Susan says:

    If this garbage is true, than Barack Obama disappoints yet again…but Republicans in office would be worse, I am pretty certain…..

  5. Rogue Warrior says:

    I find this to be accurate as I wouldn’t put it past that lying sack of poo to do that just before the state suspends his licence.

  6. POPEYE says:

    @ Heather – Snopes is full of crap. They are an old liberal couple who are funded by Soros and worship Obama. You will not be getting any unbiased and accurate info from them. They have been caught lying over and over and over. They also 9/11 was done by 19 muslims from a cave in Afghanistan with a sat phone and a laptop…. That isn’t true either…

  7. Aurora says:

    I still think I am more upset about Mrs Romney’s horse being so drugged and sold that way and the dog riding on the top of the car. Many folks "embroider" their resumes, but animal cruelty is pure evil.

  8. JimK says:

    Why do people keep quoting Snopes? Sheesh.

  9. sj says:

    The dates of voluntary surrender given in this article do not match the dates on the Illinois website ’91 for B. Obama and ’89 for M. Obama.

  10. carroll price says:

    If this is anything like the questions concerning his place of birth and whether or not his birth certificate is a fake, we’ll never know exactly why he and Michelle lost their license to practice law. Powerful people have ways of covering up and hiding embarrassing facts.

  11. george Archers says:

    Did I miss something? What evil wrong did Obama do to terminate his law license and why does the law socity give these crooks a pass. Just imagine–you drove wrecklessly and kill a few folks at a bus stop and drunk as a sailor–would it be right–that just by you withdrawing yourdriver license–makes things right.

  12. mystic says:

    It says it all in the coverup. If they had not done anything wrong, why keep secret about it, since they knew the subject would surface some time or other? People who have done something wrong have something to hide and that explains the coverup. That arouses suspicion and waves a red flag. But there is already a pattern of coverups too numerous to mention. Something is rotten in the state of Denmark. It’s called a stink.

  13. Whatishappening says:

    The difference between unalienable and inalienable is that inalienable are rights given by the state and unalienable are rights given by God or our inherent rights.

  14. DumbMeDown says:

    Jeez. WTF difference does it make? Wake up, sheep! Your incessant snoring is driving me crazy!

  15. Angel says:

    This is the kind of BS lies that finally made me wake up and see the republican party for what it really is. I will never vote republican again in my lifetime and I would hope everybody else wakes up before it is too late.

  16. James says:

    Obama has lied about everything so far, so why is it news if we find another lie? He’s a serial liar, incapable being honest. He used his "Fool me once.." card long before we even heard of him.

    What should be news is if we find something he said that was TRUE and HONEST!

    How can any nation actually consider electing this guy as their president? What does that tell you about the people who would vote for him?

  17. bys says:

    Well is it true or not? It seems that this story is just fake. A little bit of research indicated that Michelle Obama’s license is inactive and not surrendered and Obama’s is retired.

    So if that is the case, why write this?

  18. Patrick says:

    "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights…"

    I can’t believe that most of you people even believe there is a difference between a Republican or a Democrat. The above is the direct quote from the Declaration of Independence which you appear no more familiar with than does the Marxist Obama!

  19. Karmakaze says:

    @bys

    You said "So if that is the case, why write this?" The answer is he or she didn’t. It’s a slightly modified chain letter that has been going around. In this case the guy is a lawyer, in the one quoted on the Snopes site, a nurse.

    Funny how two different licensed professionals wrote the exact same "expose" about Obama.

  20. Chamberlin says:

    Conspiracy mongers like you are a sad bunch. You can’t resist the impulse to believe something that you consider "out of the mainstream" because it makes you feel smarter or more enlightened in some way. If anyone casts any doubt whatsoever on your bullshit, you say something that implies we are ‘asleep’ in some way. You all say the same thing…perhaps you’re all in cohoots and have decided as a group to tell non-believers we are just "asleep"! (See how stupid that sounds.)

    Just because you are able to string together a bunch of unverified half-truths (just finding it on the internet doesn’t make it "verified" as being true, assholes), it doesn’t mean that you have found a "bombshell" story.

    Stop poisoning the national discourse with your nonsense… fuck you and your tinfoil hats.

  21. Shhhhte says:

    @aurora – Obama ate a dog!How’s that for animal cruelty?

  22. Myke says:

    I looked at FactCheck and found it contains no facts to prove this story is false. They make a bunch of statements that are probably true, but prove nothing because they do not contradict the claims in the story. Therefore, the claims in this story and the claims in the FactCheck denial can both be true because they are two different claims.

    The most credible denial claim is from the Bar who states they never had a complaint and never took action against Obama or Michelle. Okay. If you know you will lose your license if someone takes action against you, you may be inclined to beat them to the punch and give up your license. Then the Bar can correctly say they never took action against Obama or Michelle.

    Possible? Have you ever heard of corruption in Chicago?

Trackbacks

Check out what others are saying about this post...


Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!