Bob Blaskiewicz, Faux Skeptic Exposed!

(WAC ATLANTA)   I recently posted this as a response (block quoted below) to Bob Blaskiwiecz aka Satan’s little helper at Georgia Tech Institute of Technology. He has refused to post this response and this is not the first time he has deliberately censored anyone who makes too much sense on his blog.  Bob is a defender of the sacred myth of 9/11 and like so many he will only engage in questions as long as his smoke and mirrors routine seems to be working. Once someone pierces his miasma and brings the conversation around to the cold hard empirical facts, Bob then has a favorite routine he employs, that being to either post endless amounts of pictures of lol cats, have one of his lackeys or perhaps pseudonyms online echo everything he says but with a more sincere exposure of idiocy and intolerance for different ideas, or to outright BAN the user thus silencing dissent like any good commissar is want to do. Bob blinks out his own cognitive dissonance when in person and is nearly unintelligible whilst juggling the immense amount of contradictions he must contain on any given day. Here is my recent reply to a comment stream where I again pointed out that he is nothing more than a mouth piece for maintaining the “Big Lie” as he again sought out to discredit, deride and defame anyone who dare question the government’s conspiracy theory of 9/11.  Bob is an intellectual fraud, coward and though challenged to an honest debate in an academic setting refuses completely to stand behind his words.

Please feel free to email the staff at the Georgia Institute of Technology as to why public funds should be siphoned to support someone who has no interest in scientific debate and actually lowers the collective IQ of Georgia Tech every time he opens his mouth to spew more pseudoscientific babble while posing as a “skeptic”.

You have been challenged time and again Bob. How about a real debate with experts? Your lies have worn thin and your cover is blown. Everyone sees you for the shill you are.  I hope you one day understand first hand the suffering you enable as you rightfully deserve a karmic boomerang for all of your lies and manipulation.  Shame on you.

Here is my response that was again censored on

Hi Bob,
This is Camron Wiltshire
You banned me like you ban anyone who points out the absurdity and depravity of your sophistry. I’ve nothing to hide, thus I have requested you debate your position in an academic setting. The only setting fitting for information of such a crucial nature. If you had not censored me for no other reason than arbitrary rules you make up apparently on the spot, then I would be happy to post under my name as I did until the point you censored me. Anyone willing to do research will realize I was censored for no reason other than I was asking questions that exposed you as a faux skeptic.

Bob all you are is an ad hominem spewing machine. You have no scientific refutation  whatsoever and are thus complicit in condoning a cover up of the greatest crime on American soil in history. A crime that was used to justify two illegal wars of occupation and the desecration of civil liberties here at home.  You only have playground tactics and a despicable pattern of sophistry and subterfuge that you endlessly disseminate with apparent glee and lack of conscience for the potential impact on the young minds at Georgia Tech. Scientific ethics is a mandate for employment at Georgia Tech I am assuming and you obviously are entirely delinquent in fulfillment of this sacred oath.

You have been challenged on numerous occasions and you hide behind your blog rather than attempt to honestly defend your opinions.

You also love to generate drama as a means to avoid real discussion of the evidence that demands a new and independent investigation of 9/11.

No one threatened you Bob. Please stop resorting to overworn tactics of Ad hominem and appeal to ridicule as a way to sidestep logical discussion and debate of scientific evidence.

I can’t begin to tell you how creepy you are. Sucking up to Faux skeptics, the poster boy for good german behavior who apparently has no qualms about playing the role of commissar for the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 as presented by the US Government.

3,000 Americans were killed, 6,000 + soldiers and 1 Million plus innocent Iraqi men, women, and children.

How do you sleep at night?

I don’t expect that Bob will ever present himself in a fair and moderated environment as he fears most being exposed outright in front of his peers and students at Georgia Tech. He is an intellectual fraud hiding behind his blog and has been called out on countless occasions and of course has never once answered any of the challenges.

Comments are now Closed.


See for yourself what you can expect if you point out the intellectual bankruptcy and absurdity of the illogical notions of faux skeptics like Bob and his retinue of sychophants.

Anyone from Georgia Tech who stumbles upon this and wants to maintain the integrity of science, shoot us an email at please.

15 Responses to Bob Blaskiewicz, Faux Skeptic Exposed!

  • To be clear, I’ve only ever banned a single person from my website, and that was Camron. People who post endless links/vids are grabbed by my spam filter, and I have nothing to do with that, and I’ve only ever posted them, though I need to go into the spam filter first.


  • I went through and read the whole diatribe from his blog. You should have stopped talking to the guy after the 3rd cat picture. (Emphasis needed)–> What-A-Complete-moron!! And he teaches at Georgia Tech?

    At this point, I would be working to have his sorry ass fired and ran out on a rail, as he is directly responsible for the dumbing down of our kids, and any parent who sees his ‘cat argument’ should be signing a petition to have him removed, or remove their own kid before he damages them further. If this guy is part of an skeptic movement, remind me to steer clear of the shills.

    Just another detractor playing his part for his masters. It didn’t get any more obvious than that blog.

  • “You should have stopped talking to the guy after the 3rd cat picture.”

    That was the idea.

    Get me fired then. Go on. Do it. <–not worried


  • Gordon Duff (Veterans Today)is another one of those censors on the net!


  • That’s pretty funny. I was on a talk show with Duff once on the BBC. We were on opposite sides. 🙂

  • Yep and Gordon Duff would be on different sides…his being the logical, rational side of the audio, video, photographic, testimonial, chemical and mathematical evidence that contradicts the official fairy tale…yours being the side that ignores and covers it all up.

    Peace, truth, justice and prosperity for US all, in-spite of the liars who would have it otherwise.

  • I laughed so hard, milk just came out of my nose, and I haven’t had any milk today.

  • Be honest Bob.
    We all know the milk came out of your tits. You have many cats to feed after all….

    So it’s interesting to see your willingness to engage on this forum.
    Don’t be afraid, I have a question regarding physics, structural engineering and building 7.

    You know it’s a weird sense of “deja vu”, I recall having asked this same question numerous times on your blog and never receiving anything resembling an intelligent answer.

    How again do you explain the 100 feet of free fall at the onset of Building 7’s implosion? [As admitted by NIST] Now I know your tricks, you will most likely say something to the effect of, NIST hypothesizes that there was already an internal collapse taking place (we just can’t see it!) and because I am skeptical of everyone but the government, I will avoid your question and utilize this distortion of reason to presume your argument is discredited as the exact timing is in dispute…

    So to be clear. How do you account for the collapse accelerations indistinguishable from free fall of 100 feet of the roofline into itself through the path of greatest resistance? How is that possible? Given that you apparently are so opposed to 9/11 Truth and the arguments for a new investigation, why don’t you stand behind your credentials and invoke scientific method to explain this “miraculous” sequence of events.

    “To bring this building down into its footprint required that all 58 perimeter columns and 25 core columns be destroyed simultaneously. Given this how is it possible for the steel perimeter and core columns to fail within one/tenth of a second of each other to enable the global collapse visible on screen.
    Here be objective, allow both sides to be weighed, tell your students to visit this site. Many of them are no doubt future engineers or architects and should barring indoctrination into permanent cognitive dissonance, be able to begin composing a logical line of questioning similar to those brought to light on the site.

    Of course you won’t do this, you have no interest in science, you just pretend and presume to use your placement at Tech as by proxy credentialism. Or prove me wrong, provide a workable hypothesis explaining the mechanics of the destruction of Building 7. I’d really like to hear it.

    Why don’t you or Michael Shermer show Building 7s destruction to the students and audiences you proselytize the government’s sacred myth to?

    I very much look forward to an answer from the self proclaimed conspiracy debunker from Ga. Tech.

  • I attempted to post a comment here earlier, and was censored. I inquired why my comment was censored, and I was told all comments were disabled. Since then, many comments have been added, yet my comment is still censored. Something about irony and hypocrisy may be appropriate here.

  • it’s simple…anyone who can look at the “collapse” of wtc7—47 stories falling straight down straight down straight down in under 7 seconds—and still believe it was caused “primarily due to fire”, is an idiot.

    anyone who continues to support the official conspiracy story after seeing the “collapse” of wtc7 is an idiot or a shill. shill meaning accomplice.

    “accomplice: an associate in wrongdoing, especially one who aids or abets another in a criminal act, either as a principal or an accessory.”

    this ain’t no game.

  • Thank you for exposing the truth about Bob.

    Bob Ballstooweak is either a paid shill or a sorry loser. Robert (Bob Blaskiewicz) randomly commented on a facebook post regarding Dr. Burzynski and his alternative cancer treatment (antineoplaston therapy), and provided blog as “scientific evidence” that FDA chemotherapy and pharmaceuticals (some that cause other forms of cancer) was safer than alternative therapies.

    Ballstooweak stated that b/c Dr. Burzynski had not saved every patient meant that Burzynski is a fraud, although he used “quack.” However, when I asked Robby to provide evidence that showed the statistics of how many patients die trying traditional methods,he was too flabbergasted to show any medical research disproving alternative treatments, and referred me back to the same (unfounded) blog. He was unable to keep up with the rhetoric and decided to ban me from viewing his facebook information. But of course, we found me on twitter and tried to continue to spread his one blog reference.

    If indeed Bob Blaskiewicz is a shill, then he is a sloppy uneducated one. His videos are hilarious, as in, no one watches them except his small group of friends. If he really is a professor, I feel sorry for the students who take his classes, as they would not learn anything true and free to use wikipedia as a “trusted source.”

    If anything, Ballstooweak is a classic case middle aged troll.
    But it takes one to know one, and this shall not be denied.
    Thanks for the laugh Bobby.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Show some support!

We are 100% Listener & User supported!! Every little bit helps us continue. Donations help fund the site and keep all the free information on it. Thanks in advance and KEEP UP THE FIGHT!!!

Visitor Map

Subscribe For New Posts & Updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to FederalJack and Popeyeradio and you will receive notifications of new posts by email.

News Categories
The Wigner Effect
Col. L Fletcher Prouty: Secret Team